Every now and then an inspector writes a decision which is quite simply a textbook example of how to approach a particular situation. Here is a good one relating to a log cabin within the curtilage of a dwelling (DCS Number 400-024-865) which you might wish to file and use for reference, should you come across a similar proposal during your own work.
Monthly Archives: March 2020
Causing an obstruction
Class B of Part 2 to Schedule 2 of the GPDO permits the formation, laying out and construction of a means of access to a highway which is not a trunk road or a classified road, where that access is required in connection with development permitted by any Class of Schedule 2 (other than by Class A of Part 2). Article 3(6) of the GPDO states, however, that the permission granted by Schedule 2 does not authorise any development which creates an obstruction to the view of persons using any highway used by vehicular traffic, so as to be likely to cause danger to such persons. But what might constitute an obstruction? In determining an appeal against refusal of a certificate of lawfulness for a vehicular access to a new driveway at a house in Buckinghamshire, an inspector found that the use itself of the access would cause an obstruction (DCS Number 400-024-695).
A bit Spartan
Caravan sites can sometimes be a bit Spartan so it was perhaps with this in mind that the owner of a Hampshire caravan park decided to create a new classically styled entrance. In upholding an enforcement notice requiring its removal, however, an inspector made it clear that he did not appreciate its design (DCS Number 400-025-298).
How far is too far?
While we are on the subject of temporary buildings and structures permitted under Schedule 2, Part 4, Class A of the GDPO (see Further ‘required’ reading), what is meant by ‘adjoining that land’?
Further ‘required’ reading
An inspector has quashed an enforcement notice requiring the removal of a marketing suite at a care development under construction in south London, after finding it to be permitted development (DCS Number 400-024-944).
Hot under the collar
The owner of a shisha and dessert lounge in Coventry might be feeling a bit hot under the collar after an inspector refused to sanction the retention of two artificial palm trees at the front of the building, despite the effects of climate change (DCS Number 400-025-155).
Needs to get out more
The remarks of an inspector dealing with a claim that the continued use of premises near Bristol as an A3 restaurant was lawful remind us that sometimes there is just no substitute for life experience (DCS Number 400-025-114).
It’s complicated
When a relationship comes to an end it can be complicated, and our exit from the European Union is no exception. Until everything is settled, then, the Human Rights Act of 1998 remains in place, and a claim that human rights have been breached or are threatened remains a regular occurrence during the course of planning applications and appeals. That being so, it might be useful to file a recent appeal case (DCS Number 400-024-906), in which the inspector gives a neat summary of the relationship between the planning system and human rights legislation.
Pre-agreed pre-decision?
Sometimes, the warm glow which a planning approval notice brings with it can cool on reading the conditions attached, especially if they are pre-commencement conditions with the potential to hold up the development. In these circumstances, it is worth reflecting on whether they were ever agreed to, as a recent appeal case shows (DCS Number 400-024-751).
News from PlanningResource
- City council green-lights central Oxford’s ‘first new college of the 21st century’ August 17, 2020Permission has been granted for three existing university buildings to be converted to form Oxford’s 39th college within the city’s central conservation area.
- How the planning white paper would change ... planning enforcement August 17, 2020A promise to "review and strengthen" council's enforcement powers and sanctions if new development does not meet the required design and environmental standards, including consideration of higher fines, features in the government's new planning white paper.
- 'Affordability row over plans for 700-home brownfield development' August 17, 2020A dispute over plans for 700 homes on a former gasworks site in Brighton leads our round-up of today's newspapers and news websites.
- Five authorites to pilot new spatial nature recovery strategies August 17, 2020Five local authorities are to trial the creation of new "local nature recovery strategies" (LNRS) which are intended to "support better spatial planning for nature", the government has announced.
- Thurrock Council secures injunction to block illegal development on 40-hectare green belt site August 17, 2020An Essex local authority has secured an interim High Court injunction to prevent unauthorised works on a 40-hectare green belt site - the latest in a series of court interventions by the council to restrict illegal works taking place at the location.
- High Court grants council permission to challenge inspector's green belt traveller site permission August 14, 2020The High Court has allowed a council to pursue a legal challenge to a planning inspector's decision to block its attempts to shut down a traveller encampment in the Merseyside green belt.
- Essex council gains interim injunction to prevent caravan park or travellers' camp on site August 14, 2020Brentwood Borough Council in Essex has taken preemptive High Court action to block development of land that it fears could become an unauthorised caravan park or traveller site.
- MPs 'set to frustrate mobile phone planning reforms over Huawei concerns' August 14, 2020News that some MPs concerned about the influence of Chinese telecommunications firm Huawei will "frustrate" the government's proposed planning changes around mobile phone infrastructure features in today's newspaper round-up.
- CIL Watch: Five ways the proposed changes to the planning system will affect CIL August 14, 2020Plans to scrap the community infrastructure levy (CIL) and create a new levy on development are among the far-reaching changes to the developer contributions system that were revealed in the new Planning White Paper. Here are five key changes.
- The likely risks and rewards of the proposed zonal plan system August 14, 2020Radical proposed changes to local plans, which would see them zone land into three development categories, is likely to mean more work for under-resourced council planning teams and could limit local authority control, some observers suggest. However, developers should welcome the greater certainty provided by the new system.